Polhemus v. De Lisle
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
These two suits have a common object, viz.: The enforcement of certain restrictive covenants affecting lands at Deal Beach, New Jersey, owned by the defendant DeLisle when the first bill was filed, but conveyed by him during the pendency of that suit to one Randall, who conveyed to the defendant L. Hitch Harrison on May 1st, 1925.
The original suit was pending before the late Vice-Chancellor Foster at the time of his death. The taking of testimony in that case was completed, but the case had not been argued. It was referred to me on May 22d 1925, and oral argument on behalf of complainant was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Morrow v. HasselmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
- De Gray v. Monmouth Beach Club House Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1892
- Bowen v. SmithNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1909
- Sanford v. KeerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
- Lennig v. Ocean City Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1886
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bright v. Forest Hill Park Development Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
- Babcock v. LaidlawNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Hardesty v. SilverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1956
- Homann v. TorchinskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Blaine v. RitgerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.