Babcock v. Laidlaw
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
The bill in this case was filed to restrain the defendants from violating a restrictive covenant, prohibiting, inter alia, "any building or other erection for the carrying on of any trade or businesss noxious, offensive or dangerous to the neighboring inhabitants." The situation disclosed by the pleadings and affidavits is as follows:
The complainant is the owner of a lot of land situate on the easterly corner of Northfield avenue and Rollinson street, in the town of West Orange, on which is erected a one-family dwelling. The defendants Laidlaw are the owners of a lot of land on the westerly…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rowland v. . MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Saier v. JoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Densmore v. Evergreen Camp No. 147Washington Supreme Court · 1910
- Jack Lewis, Inc. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- Cunningham v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. DrasinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- City of Los Angeles v. Rancho Homes, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
- Frizen v. PoppyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Marrocco v. Bd. of Adjustment of City of PassaicNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Trinka Services, Inc. v. STATE BD., ETC., OF NJNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.