Bright v. Forest Hill Park Development Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
The prayer of the bill of complaint is that the defendants be enjoined from constructing thirty-two duplex apartment houses on a triangular city block of land in the City of Camden bounded by Bradley Avenue, Euclid Avenue and Park Boulevard. Complainants allege that the construction of other than detached, single-family dwellings in this triangular block and the adjoining quadrangular block across Bradley Avenue is prohibited by a neighborhood scheme of restriction. No application for adinterim restraint was made by complainants and at the time of final hearing the thirty-two apartment houses…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- The Venus, Rae, MasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1814
- Scull v. EilenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
- Morrow v. HasselmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1905
- Fortesque v. CarrollSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
- De Gray v. Monmouth Beach Club House Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1892
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Toll Bros., Inc. v. Township of ReadingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Dyegard Land Partnership v. HooverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Matthews v. Kernewood, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
- Flamingo Ranch Est., Inc. v. Sunshine Ranches H., Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Wright v. Cypress Shores Development Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.