Legal Opinion

Morrow v. Hasselman

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 11, 1905PublishedCited by 34 opinions

On amended bill, supplemental bill, replication and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

Emery, Y. C.

The bill is filed to restrain the violation of building restrictions on property located on Allen avenue, in the borough of Allenhurst. Complainant and the defendants both hold title under conveyances from the Coast Land Company, which owned a large tract of land at Allenhurst, laid out in streets and avenues for the purpose of sale and improvement. Allenhurst is a' seaside summer resort, and the land company, with a view to the general improvement of its tract for purposes of residence and of sale of its remaining lands, imposed restrictions in its conveyances, some of which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Trustees of Columbia College v. . ThacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Jackson v. StevensonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. Amerman v. . DeaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Payson v. BurnhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  5. Cornish v. WiessmanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1896

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Moore v. StevensSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  2. Hooper v. LottmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Ward v. Prospect Manor Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Armstrong v. LeveroneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  5. Bethea v. LockhartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API