Legal Opinion

Homann v. Torchinsky

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 13, 1997PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

MICHELS, P.J.A.D.

Defendant Dr. Warren Torchinsky appeals from a judgment of the Chancery Division which enforced the restrictive covenant in a deed concerning a neighborhood scheme plan covering his property in the Birchwood Lake residential development in Medford Township, New Jersey, and restrained him from conducting his oral surgery practice in his home except for medical emergencies.

Defendant purchased a home in the Birchwood Lakes development on August 15, 1994. Birchwood Lakes is a private residential community, consisting of approximately 198…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Atlantic Northern Airlines, Inc. v. SchwimmerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  2. Kampf v. Franklin Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  3. Tessmar v. GrosnerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  4. Broadway Maintenance Corp. v. RutgersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  5. Casriel v. KingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bubis v. KassinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. Cooper River Plaza East, LLC v. Briad GroupNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  3. Assisted Living Associates of Moorestown, L.L.C. v. Moorestown TownshipDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  4. Eyeticket Corp. v. Unisys Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
  5. Steiger v. LenociNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API