Legal Opinion
Jay v. Clark
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 19, 1948No. Civ. 7412PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.
Plaintiff, as administrator with the will annexed of the estate of George A. Clark, deceased, brought this action against defendant to secure a winding up of the business of a partnership which had existed between decedent and defendant, who were engaged in the printing and publishing business in Madera, publishing a newspaper known as the Madera Tribune.
George A. Clark died September 7, 1944. Plaintiff’s complaint, which was filed February 9, 1945, and amended March 7, 1945, alleges that at all times since the death of decedent defendant has wholly failed and neglected to wind up the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sunset Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Froess v. FroessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Whitley v. BradleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Armbrust v. ArmbrustCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Breedlove v. J. W. & E. M. BreedLove Excavating Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Clark v. LesherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Clark v. LesherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Glassell v. PrentissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Estate of PeeblesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Barclays Bank of Cal. v. Superior Court of S.F.California Court of Appeal · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.