Glassell v. Prentiss
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
COUGHLIN, J. pro tem. *
This action arose out of an oral agreement entered into in November, 1954, between the plaintiff Glassell, as one party, the defendant Glen Ashurst, as
a second party, and the defendant partnership, Chartier, Laufer and Prentiss, which was engaged in the painting business, as a third party. The pretrial conference order recites that the parties agree that they entered into an oral contract to form a business for installing walls in houses under construction; that the plaintiff would be field superintendent of the business at a salary of $200 per week; that the defendant…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Thomas v. Hunt Manufacturing Corp.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Vangel v. VangelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Clarke v. FiedlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Brown v. National Electrics WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Green v. KensingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- People v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Estate of Skaggs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
- Adelman v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.