Legal Opinion

Glassell v. Prentiss

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 25, 1959No. Civ. 5929PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COUGHLIN, J. pro tem. *

This action arose out of an oral agreement entered into in November, 1954, between the plaintiff Glassell, as one party, the defendant Glen Ashurst, as

a second party, and the defendant partnership, Chartier, Laufer and Prentiss, which was engaged in the painting business, as a third party. The pretrial conference order recites that the parties agree that they entered into an oral contract to form a business for installing walls in houses under construction; that the plaintiff would be field superintendent of the business at a salary of $200 per week; that the defendant…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bancroft-Whitney Co. v. McHughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Thomas v. Hunt Manufacturing Corp.California Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Vangel v. VangelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Clarke v. FiedlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Brown v. National Electrics WorksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Green v. KensingerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  3. People v. FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  4. Estate of Skaggs v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  5. Adelman v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1969

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API