Legal Opinion
Clark v. Lesher
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 30, 1951No. Civ. 7969PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
Defendants in the trial court had judgment that plaintiff take nothing against them after their demurrers to the third amended complaint had been sustained without leave to amend. Plaintiff appeals.
The action purports to be brought to recover damages suffered by appellant as the result of a conspiracy among the defendants in violation of the Cartwright Act. That act, which now appears in sections 16700 to 16758 of the Business and Professions Code, declares unlawful any combination of capital, skill or acts by two or more persons with the purpose, among other things, of creating or carrying…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rideaux v. TorgrimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Herron v. HughesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Wells v. Lloyd IVCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- More v. FingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Angelus Securities Corp. v. BallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Schaefer v. BerinsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Pettitt v. LevyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Lowell v. Mother's Cake & Cookie Co.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Clark v. LesherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.