Legal Opinion
Drewrey v. Clinton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 26, 2011No. Civil Action 08-1411(RMU)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff, an African-American, brings this action against his employer, the Department of State, asserting claims of disparate treatment based on his race and retaliation for his involvement in protected activity, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. For the reasons discussed below, the court grants the defendant’s motion for…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Achagzai v. Broadcasting Board of GovernorsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Fennell v. AARPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Turner v. NicholsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Tapp v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Byrd v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.