Legal Opinion

Seattle National Bank v. Meerwaldt

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1894No. 1039PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Clallam Coumty. Action by the Seattle National Bank against Frank Meerwaldt to recover the possession of a certain warrant issued by the city of Port Angeles for the sum of $500, to one E. C. Burlingame, which, by various assignments and endorsements, came into the possession of plaintiff, and was transferred by it to one B. F. Schwartz for collection and credit, but was afterward sold by Schwartz to the defendant, without any authority it is…

Read the full summary

Appeal from Superior Court, Clallam Coumty. Action by the Seattle National Bank against Frank Meerwaldt to recover the possession of a certain warrant issued by the city of Port Angeles for the sum of $500, to one E. C. Burlingame, which, by various assignments and endorsements, came into the possession of plaintiff, and was transferred by it to one B. F. Schwartz for collection and credit, but was afterward sold by Schwartz to the defendant, without any authority it is claimed. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff upon the pleadings, in the following terms: “That the .plaintiff have and…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

— The respondent in its complaint alleged the issuance of a certain warrant by the city of Port Angeles, directing the treasurer of that city to pay to E. C. Burlingame or bearer the sum of $500. Subsequent portions of the complaint were as follows:

“3. That thereafter by several assignments and endorse*632ments written on the back of the said warrant above set forth, the said warrant came into the possession of this plaintiff for presentation to and collection of the amount due thereon from the said city of Port Angeles. ’ ’

Appellant answered:

“Tha…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Port v. ParfitWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Scott v. McGrawWashington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Collins v. North Side Publishing Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1892

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bringley v. C. I. T. CorporationSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  2. Armour v. SeixasWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Gould v. StantonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Kohout v. BrooksWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. James River National Bank v. PurchaseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API