Gould v. Stanton
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Morris, J., entered October 12, 1908, dismissing an action to quiet title and recover lands sold for taxes, after a trial before the court without a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
On February 2, 1901, defendants’ grantor purchased at tax foreclosure sale a tract of land known as Tract 2, of Day’s Acre Gardens, now situated in the city of Seattle. The property has ever since been in the possession of the defendants and the grantors, since which' time they *364have paid all taxes, assessments, and charges against the property. Improvements, by way of a house, fruit trees, berry patches, clearing and grading, have been made, of the alleged value of about $1,500. The tax proceeding was irregular, in that the summons was in the form condemned in Gould v. Knox, 53 Wash. 248, 101…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bender v. BeanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1889
- Zeimantz v. BlakeWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Griesemer v. Mutual Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Burrows v. McCalleyWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Seattle National Bank v. MeerwaldtWashington Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wick v. ReaWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Empire Ranch & Cattle Co. v. LanningSupreme Court of Colorado · 1911
- Moller v. GrahamWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- Hembree v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Pillsbury v. BeresfordWashington Supreme Court · 1910
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.