Legal Opinion

James River National Bank v. Purchase

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1900PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Stutsman County; Glaspell, J. Action by the James River National Bank of Jamestown against J. R. Purchase and others. Judgment.for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered and entered by the District Court of Stutsman county dismissing plaintiff’s case and for costs. We have reached the conclusion, from an examination of the judgment appealed from, that it -must be reversed for an irregularity which appeared upon its face, which consists entirely of an error of procedure. The judgment recites that the issues of fact came on for trial at the January, 1900, term of said court; that after a jury was impaneled to try such issues a witness was sworn on behalf of the plaintiff. At this point the defendants, by their…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kley v. . HealyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Coffin v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  3. Tooker v. . ArnouxNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Kelley v. KriessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Holcraft v. KingIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hancock v. LukeUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Claughton v. JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Sleeper v. BakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Harman v. YeagerUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Willbur v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API