Armour v. Seixas
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Mackintosh, J., entered March 3, 1913, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action of replevin, tried on the merits to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.
This is an action of claim and delivery, to recover the possession of an automobile. It was originally commenced against the defendant Seixas alone. He answered, alleging that, prior to the commencement of the action, he had delivered the property to the Elliott Bay Investment Company. On his demand, the court ordered that that company be made a party defendant. The Elliott Bay Investment Company answered, admitting possession, and claiming ownership. The plaintiff replied to these answers. The cause was tried to the court without a jury.
The court found, in substance, that, about May 29,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dow v. DempseyWashington Supreme Court · 1899
- Shealy v. TooleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
- Hetrick v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1912
- Sherman v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
- Meeker v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1891
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Winton Motor Carriage Co. v. BlombergWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- American Packing Co. v. LuketaWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Kohout v. BrooksWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Eatonville State Bank v. MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Seaboard Securities Co., Inc. v. BergWashington Supreme Court · 1932
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.