Port v. Parfit
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, King County. Action by Andrew J. Port for foreclosure of mortgage against John, Hattie and Edward Parfit, Isaac M. Dunn, George D. Corbin, Irving H. and Carrie E. Yail. Judgment for plaintiff, and tbe defendants Parfit appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Tbe opinion of the court was delivered by
Anders, C. J.
— On the 28th day of May, 1890, at Seattle, Washington, appellants, Edward Parfit and John Parfit, made and delivered to Isaac M. Dunn and George D. Corbin their promissory note for $1,136, due six months from date, with interest at the rate of ten per cent, per annum from date until paid, which note contained a stipulation for the payment of fifty dollars as attorney fees in case of suit. To secure the payment of this note the *370said Edward and John Parfit, together with Hattie Parfit, wife of the said John Parfit, on the same day duly…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- KaneCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1831
- Manly v. PetteeIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
- Colden v. KnickerbackerCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1823
- Jackson ex dem. People v. PierceNew York Supreme Court · 1813
- Dorr v. BirgeNew York Supreme Court · 1850
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. KentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1895
- State v. EdelsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Higgins v. Brown, JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- State v. BuralliNevada Supreme Court · 1903
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.