Legal Opinion

Karam v. Allstate Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1982No. 81-958PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.

This appeal requires us to determine the scope of the Ohio rule of parental immunity which bars the recovery in a tort action by a child against its parent based upon personal injuries proximately caused by negligent conduct of the parent. Appellants, in their first proposition of law, do not argue for a total abrogation of the rule, but rather urge this court to hold the rule inapplicable where, as here, the parent alleged to be negligent is deceased and liability insurance proceeds alone would be the source for the payment of any judgment granted in favor of the child.

The rule that a parent…

2Cases cited72 opinions

  1. Hewlett v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Goller v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Gibson v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Falco v. PADOSSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Kirchner v. CrystalOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Sumwalt v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Dorsey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Leach v. Newport Yellow Cab, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
  5. Karam v. Allstate Insurance Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API