Kirchner v. Crystal
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
Once again, this court is called upon to reexamine its position with respect to the doctrine of parental immunity in the state of *327Ohio. Until today, the doctrine of parental immunity has stood as an impervious obstacle for almost all children who have attempted to institute legal proceedings against their parents, in order to recover damages for injuries sustained as a result of the parent’s tortious actions. While appellant herein contends that an exception should be carved out of the general immunity framework with respect to stepparents or persons who stand in loco parentis, we find that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hewlett v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
- Goller v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Gibson v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Falco v. PADOSSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Gelbman v. GelbmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Mominee v. ScherbarthOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Mitchell v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Frye v. FryeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Shearer v. ShearerOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Spivey v. BenderOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.