Legal Opinion
Sumwalt v. Allstate Insurance
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 1, 1984No. 82-1839PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtClifford F. Brown, J.
The sole issue presented on appeal is whether plaintiff-appellant has a right to uninsured motorists benefits under her insurance policy with defendant-appellee containing the following uninsured motorists provision:
“We will pay damages for bodily injury, sickness, disease or death which a person insured is legally entitled to recover from the owner or operator of an *295' uninsured auto. Injury must be caused by accident and arise out of the "ownership, maintenance or use of an uninsured auto.” (Emphasis added.)
We conclude that appellant has a right to uninsured motorists benefits under the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Booth v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. ElkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Deshotel v. Travelers Indemnity CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
- Bonkowsky v. BonkowskyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- Guillot v. Travelers Indem. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. GilletteWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Kurent v. Farmers Insurance of Columbus, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Dairyland Insurance v. FinchOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Kirchner v. CrystalOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Tricia Miller, of the Estate of Rhonda Bishop v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.