Legal Opinion

Dorsey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1984No. 82-1662PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.

The question before the court today is whether an unemancipated minor child may maintain a cause of action in negligence against the estate of the child’s deceased parent and her liability insurance company. For the reasons to follow, we answer that question in the affirmative.

In Karam v. Allstate Ins. Co. (1982), 70 Ohio St. 2d 227 [24 O.O.3d 327], this court identified the reasons for retention of the doctrine of parental immunity to be: preservation of family tranquility, possible interference with parental discipline and control, risks of fraud and collusion due to the predominance of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wilfong v. BatdorfOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Brennecke Ex Rel. Brennecke v. KilpatrickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  3. Teramano v. TeramanoOhio Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Viers v. DunlapOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Johnson v. MyersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Scholler v. SchollerOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Kirchner v. CrystalOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Farmers Insurance Group v. ReedIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Sumwalt v. Allstate InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Mauk v. MaukOhio Supreme Court · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API