Legal Opinion

Goller v. White

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1963PublishedCited by 236 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

The issues for decision on this appeal are: (1) Was any coverage afforded plaintiff by the policy issued by Farmers Mutual to White ?

*406(2) Is a person who stands in loco parentis to a minor immune from suit by the minor to recover for personal injuries grounded upon negligence ?

The trial court’s determination, that the instant policy was not an automobile policy and, therefore, that the action could not be maintained against Farmers Mutual until judgment was first recovered against White, was made prior to our decision in Snorek v. Boyle (1962), 18 Wis. (2d) 202, 118 N. W. (2d) 132. In that…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Wait v. PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Dunlap v. DunlapSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
  5. Cowgill, Adm'r v. Boock, Adm'rOregon Supreme Court · 1950

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by236 opinions

  1. Hansen v. AH Robins, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Holodook v. SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Cates v. CatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  5. A. E. Investment Corp. v. Link Builders, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

231 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API