Gibson v. Gibson
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
We are asked to reexamine our holding in Trudell v. Leatherby (1931) 212 Cal. 678 [300 P. 7] that an unemancipated minor child may not maintain an action against his parent for negligence. That decision, announced 40 years ago, was grounded on the policy that an action by a child against his parent would “bring discord into the family and disrupt the peace and harmony of the household.” (Id. at p. 680.) If this rationale ever had any validity, it has none today. We have con-*916eluded that parental immunity has become a legal anachronism, riddled with exceptions and seriously…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Hewlett v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
- Goller v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Gelbman v. GelbmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by153 opinions
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Holodook v. SpencerNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.