Legal Opinion

Falco v. PADOS

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 1971No. Appeal, 113PublishedCited by 149 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

This is an appeal from the judgment entered below in an attachment execution proceeding. The facts stipulated by the parties are as follows:

Kristine Falco, an unemancipated minor, was injured while she was a passenger in an automobile operated by her mother, Edith Falco, when it became involved in a collision with an automobile operated by Stephen Pados.1

The minor, through her father, Edward Falco, as guardian, and the father in his own right instituted an action for damages solely against Pados. The latter *374joined Edith Falco, as an additional defendant in the…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Niederman v. BrodskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Hewlett v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1891

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by149 opinions

  1. Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Gilbert v. Korvette's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. DuBree v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Scampone v. Highland Park Care Center, LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API