Legal Opinion

City of Baldwin Park v. Stoskus

California Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1972No. L.A. 30037PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BURKE, J.

In this case we consider the question whether an award of severance damages in an eminent domain proceeding should include the amount of a special assessment lien placed upon the condemnee’s property to assist in financing the construction of a public improvement. We have concluded that the trial court properly refused to consider evidence, of the assessment lien for purposes of measuring defendant’s severance damages.

Plaintiff City of Baldwin Park (“City”) filed a complaint in eminent domain on November 16, 1967, to obtain an easement for construction of a public street and…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Duncan v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Pierpont Inn, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Eichelberger v. EichelbergerTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Vondy v. Commissioners Court of Uvalde CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In Re the Salary of the Juvenile DirectorWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Zylstra v. PivaWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Ellenbogen v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API