Silicon Valley Taxpayers' Ass'n v. Santa Clara County Open Space Authority
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J.
In 1996, Proposition 2181 limited local government’s ability to impose real property assessments in two significant ways. An assessment can be imposed only for a “special benefit” conferred on real property (art. XIIID, § 2, subd. (b)), and the assessment on any parcel must be in proportion to the special benefit conferred on the particular parcel (art. XIII D, § 4, subd. (a)).
In 2001, the Santa Clara County Open Space Authority (OSA) imposed a countywide assessment to fund a program to acquire, improve, and maintain unspecified open space lands in the county. Plaintiffs sued,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- People v. CromerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. RizoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Rider v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- California Cannabis Coalition v. City of UplandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Jacks v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Greene v. Marin County Flood Control & Water Conservation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- City of San Buenaventura v. United Water Conservation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Schmeer v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.