Legal Opinion

Rice v. Garl

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1940No. 27624PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by a minor who, while walking in a northerly direction along the west shoulder of a highway, was struck by an automobile approaching from the south. Suit was instituted against the driver of the automobile and also against the company by whom he was alleged to have been employed. Upon the trial before a jury, defendants at appropriate times moved for dismissal of the case and for a directed verdict; both motions were denied. Upon submission of the case to the jury, a general verdict in favor of plaintiff was returned against both…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Beck v. DyeWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Khoury v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. Carlson v. P. F. Collier & Son Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Venho v. Ostrander Railway & Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Nettleship v. ShipmanWashington Supreme Court · 1931

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. American Products Co. v. VillwockWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Scholz v. LeuerWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Balise v. UnderwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  4. United States v. Harold KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  5. Elder v. Cisco Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API