Legal Opinion

Nettleship v. Shipman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1931No. 22936. Department TwoPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

At the hour of noon, November 23, 1928, W. W. Nettleship and K. B. Panchot were riding in a small truck, owned and driven by Mr. Nettleship, which was proceeding in a general northwesterly direction along the Inland Empire Highway at a point about a mile and a half north of Wallula. Defendant J. E. Shipman, a salesman in the employ of defendant Reid Bros., Inc., a wholesale dealer in hospital and surgical supplies, was proceeding in the same direction in his Hudson coupe, and, in attempting to pass the truck, struck its left front wheel, wrecking the truck and injuring Messrs. Nettleship and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Khoury v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  2. Gall v. Detroit Journal Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Barton v. Studebaker Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. McCarthy v. SoutherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  5. Aldrich v. Tyler Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. American National Insurance v. DenkeTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Kaiser v. Suburban Transportation SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Stockwell v. MorrisWyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  4. American Nat. Ins. Co. v. DenkeTexas Commission of Appeals · 1936
  5. Griffith v. Electrolux Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1940

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API