Legal Opinion

Beck v. Dye

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1939No. 27295. En BancPublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by a pedestrian from the impact of an automobile while crossing a street intersection. Trial by jury resulted in a verdict for plaintiffs, husband and wife. Motions for new trial and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict having been denied, judgment on the verdict was entered, from which defendants, also husband and wife, have appealed. The plaintiff wife will be referred to hereinafter as though she were the sole respondent, and the defendant husband will be referred to as though he were the sole appellant.

As grounds for…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Estill v. BerryWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Corbaley v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Vercruysse v. Cascade Laundry Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Mathias v. EichelbergerWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Ahrens v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. BoastWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Johnston v. OhlsWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Miller, Carol A., and Miller, Howard C., Her Husband v. Keating, Lawrence M., and Texaco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  5. State v. ChapinWashington Supreme Court · 1992

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API