Legal Opinion

Carlson v. P. F. Collier & Son Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1937No. 26457. Department OnePublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMillard, J.

While operating an automobile owned by C. H. Pope, and in which Frances G. Carlson was riding, F. D. Floyd fell asleep and ran» the automobile off the road and down an embankment, as the result of which Mrs. Carlson was injured.

This action was instituted by Frances G. Carlson and husband to recover from P. F. Collier & Son Corporation, C. H. Pope, F. D. Floyd, and two others (which individuals were alleged to be the employes of the defendant corporation), for personal injuries sustained by Mrs. Carlson in the accident described above. The trial of the cause to the jury resulted in a verdict…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Larson v. American Bridge Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Russ v. Wabash Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  3. Glover v. Richardson & Elmer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Dahl v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Dorian v. Benj. E. Boone, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Balise v. UnderwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Ellerman v. Centerpoint Prepress, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Ellerman v. Centerpoint Prepress, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Washington Recorder Publishing Co. v. ErnstWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Globe Indemnity Co. v. Victill Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API