Venho v. Ostrander Railway & Timber Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries resulting from a collision of two logging trains. The defendants operated logging trains, independently, over the same line of track extending from Ostrander back into the hills to the east.
At the time of the collision, plaintiff was riding on one of the trains of the Ostrander Railway & Timber Company. For about two weeks prior thereto, he had been employed in tbe woods by that company as a “faller,” but had ceased to work as such tbe evening before tbe accident and, at tbe time be was injured, was on bis way out from tbe…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Donovan's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Harrison v. Central Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
- Swanson v. LathamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
- Sylcox v. National Lead Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1931
- Hama Hama Logging Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1930
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. CurrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Aloha Lumber Corp. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1970
- California Casualty Indemnity Exchange v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Superior Asphalt & Concrete Co. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.