Legal Opinion
Elder v. Cisco Construction Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 1, 1958No. 34256PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident that involved plaintiffs and one Roy W. Hurst, who, it was alleged, .
“ . . . was then and there acting for and on behalf of the defendant Cisco Construction Company, and was then and there in the performance of his duties with the said defendant Cisco Construction Company, and acting on their behalf.”
On motion of plaintiffs, Roy W. Hurst was dismissed as a party defendant because service of process had not been obtained on him.
The construction company, an Oregon corporation, appeals from a judgment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Greene v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1958
- Romero v. HogueLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
- Carroll v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
- Roletto v. Department Stores Garage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1948
- Rice v. GarlWashington Supreme Court · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Jerrie M. Simmons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Dickinson v. EdwardsWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Fruit v. SchreinerAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Luth v. Rogers and Babler Construction CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Thompson v. Everett ClinicCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.