Legal Opinion

Dobson v. McClennen

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 2015No. CV-14-0313-PRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice BALES,

opinion of the Court.

¶ 1 The Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (“AMMA”), passed by voters in 2010 and codified as A.R.S. §§ 36-2801-2819, allows a person who has been diagnosed by a physician as having a debilitating medical condition to apply for a card identifying the holder as a registered qualifying patient. Such patients may possess and use limited amounts of marijuana for medical reasons. The AMMA broadly immunizes them from prosecution for using medical marijuana consistent with the Act.

¶ 2 Arizona’s laws generally make it a crime for a person to drive with any amount…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. GomezArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State of Arizona Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Hrach ShilgevorkyanArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State of Arizona v. Shawnte Shuree JonesArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Dobson v. McClennenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Erik Milton ChildsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  2. Com. v. Stone, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  3. State of Arizona v. Robert GearArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State of Arizona v. Kyle Andrew StollCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  5. Gersten v. Sun Pain Management, P.L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API