Legal Opinion
Dobson v. McClennen
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided November 4, 2014No. Nos. 1 CA-SA 14-0168, 1 CA-SA 14-0170PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
THUMMA, Judge.
¶ 1 Petitioners Krishna R. Dobson and Marvelle D. Anderson were convicted in municipal court of driving with an impermissible drug or its metabolite in a person’s body in violation of Arizona Revised Statutes (AR.S.) section 28-1381(A)(3) (2014).1 Petitioners claim the superior court erred in affirming the municipal court’s pretrial rulings precluding evidence that Petitioners held medical marijuana cards at the time of the offenses. Athough accepting special action jurisdiction, this court denies relief because Petitioners have shown no error.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' CooperativeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Vo v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dobson v. McClennenArizona Supreme Court · 2015
- State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco IICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco IICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco IICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- dobson/anderson v. Hon. mcclennen/mesa ProsecutorArizona Supreme Court · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.