Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Shawnte Shuree Jones

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 2014No. CR-13-0292-PRPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice BRUTINEL,

opinion of the Court.

¶ 1 AR.S. § 13-116 requires that concurrent sentences be imposed on a defendant whose convictions stem from a single act. Conversely, A.R.S. § 13-705(M) requires that sentences imposed on a defendant convicted of certain dangerous crimes against children run consecutively even when the underlying convictions arise from a single act. Resolving the conflict between these statutes, we hold that the trial court properly imposed consecutive sentences pursuant to § 13-705(M).

I. BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Shawnte Jones called 911 to report that her daughter had accidentally…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. LopezArizona Supreme Court · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Michael Jonathon CarlsonArizona Supreme Court · 2015
  2. City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Electronics, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2017
  3. David C., Kim C. v. Alexis S., A.C.Arizona Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Dobson v. McClennenArizona Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State of Arizona v. Anthony LewisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API