State of Arizona v. Shawnte Shuree Jones
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Justice BRUTINEL,
opinion of the Court.
¶ 1 AR.S. § 13-116 requires that concurrent sentences be imposed on a defendant whose convictions stem from a single act. Conversely, A.R.S. § 13-705(M) requires that sentences imposed on a defendant convicted of certain dangerous crimes against children run consecutively even when the underlying convictions arise from a single act. Resolving the conflict between these statutes, we hold that the trial court properly imposed consecutive sentences pursuant to § 13-705(M).
I. BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Shawnte Jones called 911 to report that her daughter had accidentally…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. LopezArizona Supreme Court · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Michael Jonathon CarlsonArizona Supreme Court · 2015
- City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Electronics, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2017
- David C., Kim C. v. Alexis S., A.C.Arizona Supreme Court · 2016
- Dobson v. McClennenArizona Supreme Court · 2015
- State of Arizona v. Anthony LewisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.