Legal Opinion

State of Arizona v. Robert Gear

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 2016No. CR-14-0408-PRPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice BOLICK,

opinion of the Court:

¶ 1 This ease presents the question of whether the Arizona Medical Marijuana Act (“AMMA” or “the Act”) immunizes a physician against prosecution for falsely attesting that he reviewed a patient’s medical records from the previous twelve months before providing a written certification authorizing medical marijuana use. We hold that AMMA does not grant such immunity.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Arizona Medical Marijuana Act

¶ 2 Arizona voters enacted AMMA, A.R.S. § 36-2801 et seq., by ballot initiative in 2010 (Proposition 203). The Act provides that a “qualifying patient”…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Riverside v. Inland Empire Patients Health & Wellness Center, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
  2. People v. MentchCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Keenan Reed-Kaliher v. Hon. hoggat/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2015
  4. State of Arizona v. Shawnte Shuree JonesArizona Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Dobson v. McClennenArizona Supreme Court · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Parsons v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  2. White Mountain Health Center, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  3. Whitmire v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2019
  4. Arizona Cannabis Nurses Ass'n v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  5. Gersten v. Sun Pain Management, P.L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API