State v. Gomez
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BALES, Justice.
VIA 1996 initiative measure known as Proposition 200 requires courts to place certain first- and second-time drug offenders on probation including appropriate drug treatment or education. Ariz.Rev.Stat. (“A.R.S.”) § 13-901.01 (2002). Mandatory probation, however, does not apply to any defendant “who has been convicted of or indicted for a violent crime,” and such persons may be imprisoned for their drug offenses. A.R.S. § 13-901.01(B).
V 2 The issue here is whether a ten-year-old, dismissed indictment disqualifies a defendant from mandatory probation under Proposition…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dickerson v. New Banner Institute, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. LindseyArizona Supreme Court · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- Petersen v. Magna Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. McGillArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Robert Baker v. University Physicians HealthcareArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- State of Arizona Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Hrach ShilgevorkyanArizona Supreme Court · 2014
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.