State v. Hansen
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McGREGOR, Chief Justice.
¶ 1 Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) section 13-804.D (2001) directs that “[r]estitution payments ... shall not be stayed if the defendant files a notice of appeal, and the payments may be held by the court pending the outcome of an appeal.” Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 31.6 provides in relevant part that “[a] sentence to pay a fine or restitution shall be stayed pending appeal.” This case requires us to decide whether A.R.S. § 13-804.D and Rule 31.6 conflict and, if so, which provision controls. For the reasons stated below, we hold that these provisions…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. RobinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Adams v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. HouserArizona Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. GomezArizona Supreme Court · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Phil GutierrezArizona Supreme Court · 2012
- State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew PayneArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- Manuel M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- State of Arizona Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Hrach ShilgevorkyanArizona Supreme Court · 2014
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.