Legal Opinion

State v. Hansen

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 30, 2007No. CR-06-0459-PRPublishedCited by 122 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McGREGOR, Chief Justice.

¶ 1 Arizona Revised Statutes (A.R.S.) section 13-804.D (2001) directs that “[r]estitution payments ... shall not be stayed if the defendant files a notice of appeal, and the payments may be held by the court pending the outcome of an appeal.” Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 31.6 provides in relevant part that “[a] sentence to pay a fine or restitution shall be stayed pending appeal.” This case requires us to decide whether A.R.S. § 13-804.D and Rule 31.6 conflict and, if so, which provision controls. For the reasons stated below, we hold that these provisions…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. RobinsonArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Adams v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. HouserArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. GomezArizona Supreme Court · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by122 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Phil GutierrezArizona Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State of Arizona v. Christopher Mathew PayneArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Manuel M. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. State of Arizona Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Hrach ShilgevorkyanArizona Supreme Court · 2014

117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API