Legal Opinion

State of Arizona Ex Rel. Montgomery v. Hrach Shilgevorkyan

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 2014No. CV-13-0056-PRPublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

justice BRUTINEL,

opinion of the Court.

¶ 1 Arizona Revised Statutes § 28-1381(A)(3) makes it unlawful for a driver to be in actual physical control of a vehicle if there is “any drug defined in [AR.S.] § 13-3401 or its metabolite in the person’s body.” We are asked to determine whether the phrase “its metabolite” includes Carboxy-Tetrahydrocannabinol (“Carboxy-THC”), a non-impairing metabolite of Cannabis,1 a proscribed drug listed in § 13-3401. We conclude that it does not.

I

¶ 2 Police stopped a vehicle driven by Hrach Shilgevorkyan for speeding and making unsafe lane changes. Suspecting that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Bilke v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Amanda Watts v. Medicis Pharmaceutical CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State of Iowa v. Erik Milton ChildsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  3. State of Iowa v. Jeffrey John MyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  4. State of Arizona v. Armando Pena, Jr.Arizona Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco IIArizona Supreme Court · 2016

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API