Garay v. State

VOIGT, Chief Justice.

[T1] The appellant contends that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for third-degree sexual assault. We affirm.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

[T2] Our standard for reviewing a sufficiency of the evidence claim is as follows:

When reviewing a sufficiency of the evidence claim in a criminal case, we must determine whether a rational trier of fact could find the essential elements of the crime were proven beyond a reasonable doubt. We do not consider conflicting evidence presented by the unsuccessful party, and afford every favorable inference which may be…