Estrada-Sanchez v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
[T1] Jorge Estrada-Sanchez appeals his convictions on two counts of conspiracy with intent to deliver methamphetamine.1 He *706challenges subject matter jurisdiction and the sufficiency of the evidence that permitted his conduct in California to form the basis of a Wyoming prosecution; he contends that the Information improperly varied from the evidence at trial; and he complains of prose-cutorial misconduct and trial errors.
[12] We reject the State's assertion that a detailed affidavit cured a constitutionally defective Information, or that the failure to obtain a bill of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. VangerpenWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. McClatcheyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Harris v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Butcher v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Cazier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Heywood v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Lopez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Moore v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.