Legal Opinion
May v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided January 30, 2003No. 01-40PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEHMAN, Justice.
[¶ 1] May appeals his convictions for aggravated assault and battery with a deadly weapon and aggravated burglary arising from his entry into the home of his wife’s parents and his stabbing of two people. May claims that his aggravated burglary conviction cannot stand as the jury was instructed in the alternative and there was insufficient evidence to support one of the alternatives. May further asserts that his Sixth Amendment right to counsel was violated.
[¶ 2] We reverse in part and affirm in part.
ISSUES
[¶ 3] May states the issues as follows:
I. Whether there was…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Bloomquist v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Sincock v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Doherty v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Urbigkit v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
- Kenyon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Gabriel R. Drennen v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.