Legal Opinion

Broom v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1985No. 84-33PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROONEY, Justice.

Appellant appeals from the judgment and sentence of the court rendered on a jury verdict which found appellant guilty of obtaining possession of a controlled substance by fraud in violation of § 35-7-1033(a)(iii), W.S.1977.1 On appeal, appellant contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury verdict, and that the trial court erred in not permitting testimony relative to an opinion of a handwriting expert.

We affirm.

I

In determining whether or not there was sufficient evidence to support a jury verdict, we are not to reweigh the evidence. The following standard…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Curley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  5. Mammoth Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Scadden v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Dice v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Roose v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Bouwkamp v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  5. McCone v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API