Anderson v. State

KITE, Justice.

[¶ 1] Denise Anderson challenges her convictions on three counts of delivering marijuana to minors. She argues the State did not present sufficient evidence for the jury to conclude that she actually delivered the controlled substances to the minors. Applying our standard of review, we conclude the evidence, together with the reasonable inferences flowing from it, was sufficient to support the jury’s verdicts.

[¶ 2] We affirm.

ISSUE

[¶ 3] Ms. Anderson phrases the issue as: I. Did the State fail to establish a prima facie case of delivery and did that failure amount to insufficient…