Legal Opinion

Tanner v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 2002No. 01-53PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Appellant Ronald A. Tanner (Tanner) seeks reversal of his conviction for one count of burglary arising from his entry into a Casper bar, through an unlocked door, during business hours. Having determined that the record discloses insufficient evidence to support the conviction as instructed to the jury: we reverse the conviction, vacate the judgment and sentence entered by the district court, and remand with instruction that a judgment of acquittal be entered.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] Tanner presents the following issues for review:

I. Whether there was sufficient evidence to support…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. CarothersWashington Supreme Court · 1974

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Dettloff v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Sincock v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Doherty v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Urbigkit v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Kenyon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API