Legal Opinion
Mather v. Mather
California Supreme Court
Decided December 29, 1944No. L. A. 18987PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
This ease has had a confused procedural history and various controversial points arising in connection with its ultimate determination have been under successive review by this court, as will hereinafter appear. The present appeal is from a judgment purportedly entered in accord with the most recent observations of this court in the matter. (Mather v. Mather, 22 Cal.2d 713 [140 P.2d 808].) The facts are fully stated in the cited opinion and it is but necessary here to make a brief outline of the progressive stages of this prolonged litigation as there recited.
In 1934 the plaintiff commenced…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Mather v. MatherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Mather v. MatherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Rice v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Greenfield v. MatherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Raphael v. RaphaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Martinez v. Albuquerque Collection Services, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1994
- Branche v. HetzelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Jackson v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.