Legal Opinion

Rice v. Schmid

California Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1944No. L. A. 19018PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.

On a prior appeal by plaintiff (18 Cal.2d 382 [115 P.2d 498, 138 A.L.R. 589] )a judgment for $712.45 for breach of a contract to purchase flour was reversed with directions, and thereafter a second judgment for $190 was entered. Plaintiff, asserting the trial court failed to follow such directions, has appealed for the second time.

On July 16, 1937, plaintiff, a wholesale flour merchant, entered into a written contract with John Schmid, the proprietor of the Eagle Bakery, in which he agreed to sell to Schmid 6,000 barrels of flour at the following prices:

Barrels Price per barrel 2,000…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cowdery v. London Etc. BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Rice v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. English v. Olympic Auditorium, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Weaver v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Lineman v. SchmidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Hampton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Kenney v. KenneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Ayyad v. Sprint SpectrumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API