Legal Opinion

Mather v. Mather

California Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1936No. L. A. 15233PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

This is a motion to dismiss an appeal from a purported judgment.

While domiciled in the territory of Hawaii, plaintiff Mather transferred to his wife, the respondent Anna Inez Mather, real and personal property of considerable value situated in the state of California. Plaintiff sued for a return of the property. The complaint recited three alleged causes of action. The third cause of action, with which we are here concerned, gave the pleader considerable difficulty, and he made four attempts to state it, the attempts finally culminating in the filing, on December 10,1934, of a pleading…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gunder v. GunderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Middleton v. FinneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. De Vally v. Kendall De Vally Operalogue Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Potvin v. Pacific Greyhound Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Vasquez v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Gombos v. AsheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Sullivan v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Greenfield v. MatherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API