Legal Opinion
Clayton v. Fleming Companies, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 21, 2000No. 90,840PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOUDREAU, Justice.
{ 1 Two questions are presented on certio-rari: (1) Was the trial judge's order denying the claim sufficiently definite and certain to allow for meaningful judicial review, and (2) Did the Court of Civil Appeals exceed its authority by mandating a procedure to be followed in all future "cases of this specific nature"? We answer both questions in the affirmative. Accordingly, we vacate the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, Division 4, and sustain the trial judge's November 6, 1997 order, affirmed by a three-judge panel of the Workers' Compensation Court.
1
FACTUAL…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Hough v. LeonardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Wright v. Grove Sun Newspaper Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
- Reynolds v. Special Indemnity FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Lanman v. Oklahoma County Sheriff's OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Davis v. Southwestern Bell TelephoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- Lively v. Ijam, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
- Jobe v. American Legion 7Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Bird Construction Co. v. Oklahoma City Housing AuthorityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
- Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. v. Krown SystemsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.