Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OP ALA, Justice.
The issues we are asked to decide today are simply put by these two questions: 1) May a trial judge, by nunc pro tunc correction of an earlier unrecorded deficiency adjudication (that was misfiled in the court clerk’s office), reorder judgment hen priorities? and 2) Does a recorded foreclosure decree establish hen priority for a later acquired but unrecorded deficiency judgment? Our answer to both questions is in the negative.
The parties in this case are two companies with competing judgment hen claims sought to be impressed against the same real property. By summary judgment…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kluver v. Weatherford Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Flick v. CrouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- United States Ex Rel. Farmers Home Administration v. ReedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. TidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by210 opinions
- Fanning v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Barnes v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Arrow Tool & Gauge v. MeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Rivas v. Parkland ManorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
205 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.