Legal Opinion

Bird Construction Co. v. Oklahoma City Housing Authority

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 7, 2004No. 98,703PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

TOM COLBERT, Chief Judge:

¶ 1 Bird Construction Company, Inc., appeals from the trial court’s post-judgment orders in its successful claim against the Oklahoma City Housing Authority (OCHA) for breach of contract and libel. OCHA counter-appeals from the judgment and award of pre-judgment and post-judgment interest. The issues on appeal are numerous. Based upon our review of the record and applicable law, we conclude that the majority of the issues raised by the parties do not warrant reversal, but that the trial court did err in part. We, therefore, affirm in part, reverse in part,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Reherman v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Salazar v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. Florafax International Inc. v. GTE Market Resources, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  4. Hain v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  5. Taylor v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Peters v. American Income Life Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
  2. Fuller v. PachecoCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
  3. Tsotaddle v. Absentee Shawnee Housing AuthorityCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000
  4. Caterpillar Inc. v. Trinity Industries, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
  5. Cleveland v. Dyn-A-Mite Pest Control, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API