Legal Opinion
Lively v. Ijam, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided April 19, 2005No. 99,357PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
JERRY L. GOODMAN, Presiding Judge:
¶ 1 IJAM, Inc., and Monarch Computer Systems, Inc., (collectively Defendants) appeal from a judgment in favor of Plaintiff, V.J. Lively.1 The issue on appeal is whether the trial court properly determined that it had in personam jurisdiction over these Georgia corporations. Upon review of the record on appeal and applicable law, we find that the trial court erred in finding that it had jurisdiction based on the evidence before it. Therefore, we reverse its decision and remand the case for further proceedings.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 Lively, an…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rogers v. Dell Computer Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Rogers v. Dell Computer Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- TUCKER v. THE COCHRAN FIRM-CRIMINAL DEFENSE BIRMINGHAM L.L.C.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Triad International Maintenance Corp. v. Aim Aviation, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2006
- Howard Family Charitable Foundation, Inc. v. TrimbleCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.