Legal Opinion
Hough v. Leonard
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 29, 1993No. 75755PublishedCited by 131 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAUGER, Justice:
The only issue addressed1 is whether the trial court properly exercised jurisdiction over the three Texas residents who entered into a contract in Oklahoma with an Oklahoma resident to perform services in Kansas. We find that it did. However, we also find that we must address a question of appellate procedure to ensure that all litigants are treated equitably and that all issues properly preserved, raised and briefed on appeal are addressed. Johnson v. Wade, 642 P.2d 255, 257 (Okla.1982), is hereby overruled to the extent that it provides that any party, whether “winner” or…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by131 opinions
- Nealis v. BairdSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Lockhart v. LoosenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Pitco Production Co. v. Chaparral Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Yocum v. Greenbriar Nursing HomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Finnell v. SeismicSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.